Midnight in Paris.
a) Paul
says that Nostalgia is denial. The
denial of painful present. Do you agree with this?
In real life it may be expressed when some
people want to return to childhood, or to another city or country where they
have lived a more complete life and a more friendly and happy environment.
I think in the case of the film, it is the
denial of an unsatisfactory, frustrating and exhausting Gil´s life , clearly
Paul did not have that problem but Gil suffered with a life that he could not
control and make richer in feelings, happiness and creativity.
Gil did not accept his unsatisfactory life, so
the refuge was the France of 1920s. He had a world he could not share with
Inez. They had nothing in common except the plan to marry.
The triggers for this denial were all around
Gil: a girlfriend who did not understand him, materialistic political relatives.
She wanted to live in Malibu and Gil
wanted to live in Paris, they were absolutely different, and being different is
fine, but you must respect those differences and accept the other as an independent
person who decide together to be life partners. Ines was intolerant.
I think Gil's denial was an unsatisfactory and
incomplete life. Inez represented everything that Gil destabilized him in terms
of what he wanted to achieve and limited his freedom and inspiration.
Gil was a writer living in this particular
world full of imagination and adventures waiting to be lived. Anyways being an
emotions seeker is typical from writers and artists.
On the other side, Inez is fine, but she
needed another totally different person next to her, Gil definitely was not
that person.
I think that it is a great analysis of Gill's emotional personality, but I have some doubts about it: Do yout really think that everything was only in his mind or it was a bad conclusion?, and how can you explan the time traveliings of Adriana and the private detective?.
ReplyDeleteFinally. what did you mean with this piece of text: "Anyways being an emotions seeker is typical from writers and artists"? I coudn't understend it clearly.